He gave bookie prosecuted for not-validated a winning bet!
A gambler sues British agency William Hill after she refused to pay a winning bet, and after more than 17 months it won the case!
Julius Ndlovu, a student in the UK, in March 2015 placed a bet whereby Roger Federer to win a set against Tomas Berdych 6: 3 at a level of 2001! The bet was on just 50 cents, but he was successful, making a profit of £ 1,000 young. The William Hill did not want to pay the winnings because an employee has gone wrong odds. Instead they offered bettor two £ 50 freebet sites as a sign of good faith.
Ndlovu did not accept the proposal from the bookmaker, and decided to sue. After more than 17 months and gave a verdict in this case, to the surprise of many young winning. British bookmaker had to send both its earnings and cash interest and related costs. Finally the young man received a check for £ 1,826! Although it has been shown excited about the decision, he said he does not stop there.
I do not understand why the bookie was acted so. From what I know, they have invested around £ 10,000 in costs just to save £ 1,000, and all lost! Although I am happy that I finally won, I go and Gambling Commission to file a complaint because the agency was performed in an unacceptable and totally unprofessional. I do not know if offered rate then was wrong or not, but my job is to calculate betting odds to bet I know that the future will be paid or not. If they made a mistake and it is reasonable to assume, because today I accidentally bet and lost, did not see money back. I asked several times to prove they were wrong and refused every time.